Hello @postmeback! Thanks for your interest in contributing to the Meilisearch docs.

I'm afraid I will have to refuse your contribution and close the PR because it doesn't meet our quality standards:

1. Your proposed fix for the JWT link is not in a helpful spot. You placed it right after a sentence talking about encryption algorithms, which implies users will learn more about a the subject. jwt.io's homepage has almost no information on that subject. A better place would have been at the beginning of the article
2. Additionally, you added the link with a generic "click here". Link text should be descriptive and better integrated in the regular text flow
3. Your second fix hijacks an example explanation with information extraneous to that example. That is confusing and unhelpful for users
4. Your second fix also makes unnecessary use of <br>s. Never use <br> to create new lines as this leads to unclear information hierarchy and might cause presentation issues depending on screen size
5. This is not a hard rule, but we generally prefer to have a single PR per issue unless the issues are very closely related. This makes the PR easier to review and avoids PR scope creep. Webtokens and the limit search parameter are completely unrelated.

Thanks again for the interest!